It's more popular in Japan than in the west, but there is a small community of artists in the west who love this program too. ![]() I think lines in this look really smooth and it does a better job at mimicking how physical paintings actually look than some of the bigger name products out there.Ĭons: It has far less features than what Adobe has got going on, and it's not an industry standard at all. Most people who use this do so as hobbyists thanks to Adobe. ![]() This also means you'll find less resources available as well. Overall: For digital drawing/painting, I actually prefer this and many other lesser known art products out there over what Adobe has to offer. It costs less, and you can find the older versions for free which still work great. I prefer how pieces come out looking using this, and honestly wish Adobe didn't have so much of this market cornered so that more art programs could really flourish. ![]() It doesn't have all the bells and whistles that Adobe has to offer, but for digital painting, you honestly don't need most of that stuff anyway.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |